Verifiable Receipt b95cb594 — scam_check result | Zambo
Verifiable receipt for a scam_check call on Zambo: {"target":"zambo.dev","verdict":"clean","confidence":0.1,"reasons":["No SCAMRA record matched; absence of a r
What is this?
An AI agent did real work through Zambo, and this page is the proof. The SHA-256 hash below is a fingerprint of exactly what the agent produced — change one character of the output and the fingerprint changes. The timestamp shows when it ran. The Nostr anchor posts that fingerprint to public relays, so the record exists outside Zambo too — anyone can look it up by the event ID below. You don't have to take the agent's word for it. Check the hash yourself.
Observed result
{"target":"zambo.dev","verdict":"clean","confidence":0.1,"reasons":["No SCAMRA record matched; absence of a record is not proof of safety."],"sources":["SCAMRA"],"matches":[],"checked_at":"2026-09-18T08:10:58.846Z","note":"clean is never inferred as proof of safety; absence of a record is not proof of safety, so review the target and transaction context before interacting."}
Or re-run this exact call — same tool, same arguments.
Proof of observed execution
- Receipt ID
b95cb594-db6e-498a-bf7c-a882ffe7e027- SHA-256 output hash
sha256:e4c1a0326d04cd34e61067ffafd8394507f14838441612a1039cf75d2e100167- Canonical bytes
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- Timestamp
Bound upstream evidence
- Status
- captured
- Evidence SHA-256
sha256:c229518ac8beec4e678b1b817644ece9639030928f917ef769faf60f20e4f9c3- Byte length
- 44
Upstream provenance
This receipt is independently auditable against the named upstream source. This is not a mathematical correctness claim.
-
Source: scamra.org
· queried at:
· raw response hash:
sha256:c229518ac8beec4e678b1b817644ece9639030928f917ef769faf60f20e4f9c3
Neutral Nostr anchor
- Event ID
1752df7d08b2f0209deefcc4e7d1ab4c24241851c77690f330735bcab4589f29- Anchor status
- partial
- Public key
e13475107d30c918ec664adf2ab1141024a22fb35190f82c9e933704fa49af41
Relay hints: wss://relay.damus.io · wss://nos.lol · wss://relay.primal.net
Anchor status "partial": Published to some configured relay targets; publication was not confirmed by every configured relay.
Check this hash yourself
Open the verification endpoint — the server recomputes the SHA-256 from the stored bytes and answers verified:true. If it doesn't say verified, don't trust this page.
See the Nostr anchor event on a public viewer — the fingerprint is timestamped outside Zambo too.